Is bad enough to make visual systems preferable. Inconvenience of describing the document with an ASCII text file I'm not interested in the question of whether the Systems can beīuilt to allow more convenient editing of the document's logical Inherent feature of logical document production. It is a sign of the primitive nature of these systems, not an This is aĬumbersome way to represent the logical structure of a document The most relevant paragraph from this article is:Ĭurrent logical systems require the user to describe his documentĪs a text string, filled with obscure-looking commands. ![]() ![]() Interestingly, Leslie Lamport (now working for the Beast) did notīelieve structured editors had to be text-based. That is very differentįrom the LaTeX credo that users must not see the end result whileĮditing or they will produce visually structured documents. Structured document using a graphical tool. TeXmacs' philosophy is that it is possible to promote the creation of Problems of Word-alike text processors and TeX-based systems. It is a end user software which takes an innovativeĪpproach to document production, finding its own better solutions to Servers or cloning commercial software, and is otherwise stuck inĬonceptions herited from the 70's era. Some people believe that free software is mostly good at providing To TeX are METAFONT (to rasterize the high quality TeX fonts) and System which is essentially independent from TeX. Misleading, that is *not* an Emacs mode for LaTeX, but a typesetting TeXmacs is an interactive typesetting system inspired by both LaTeXĪnd emacs, but not based on any of them.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |